Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
3.
Healthc Q ; 24(2): 38-39, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1323454

ABSTRACT

Clinical environments that provide mental health and addictions care have been challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic due to health human resource shortages. This paper provides some insights gleaned from nurse and physician leaders working together during the pandemic in the mental health context to tackle some of these challenges. Key takeaways are provided.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Decision Making, Organizational , Humans , Leadership , Ontario/epidemiology , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , Telemedicine , Vaccination Refusal
4.
Scand J Public Health ; 49(1): 29-32, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1207563

ABSTRACT

The emergence of COVID-19 has changed the world as we know it, arguably none more so than for older people. In Sweden, the majority of COVID-19-related fatalities have been among people aged ⩾70 years, many of whom were receiving health and social care services. The pandemic has illuminated aspects within the care continuum requiring evaluative research, such as decision-making processes, the structure and organisation of care, and interventions within the complex public-health system. This short communication highlights several key areas for future interdisciplinary and multi-sectorial collaboration to improve health and social care services in Sweden. It also underlines that a valid, reliable and experiential evidence base is the sine qua non for evaluative research and effective public-health systems.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Interdisciplinary Research/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Evidence-Based Practice , Humans , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , Residential Facilities/standards , Social Work/organization & administration , Social Work/standards , Sweden/epidemiology
5.
Med Health Care Philos ; 24(2): 189-204, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1160870

ABSTRACT

The Covid-19 pandemic is a tragedy for those who have been hard hit worldwide. At the same time, it is also a test of concepts and practices of what good care is and requires, and how quality of care can be accounted for. In this paper, we present our Care-Ethical Model of Quality Enquiry (CEMQUE) and apply it to the case of residential care for older people in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 pandemic. Instead of thinking about care in healthcare and social welfare as a set of separate care acts, we think about care as a complex practice of relational caring, crossed by other practices. Instead of thinking about professional caregivers as functionaries obeying external rules, we think about them as practically wise professionals. Instead of thinking about developing external quality criteria and systems, we think about cultivating (self-)reflective quality awareness. Instead of abstracting from societal forces that make care possible but also limit it, we acknowledge them and find ways to deal with them. Based on these critical insights, the CEMQUE model can be helpful to describe, interrogate, evaluate, and improve existing care practices. It has four entries: (i) the care receiver considered from their humanness, (ii) the caregiver considered from their solicitude, (iii) the care facility considered from its habitability and (iv) the societal, institutional and scholarly context considered from the perspective of the good life, justice and decency. The crux is enabling all these different entries with all their different aspects to be taken into account. In Corona times this turns out to be more crucial than ever.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , COVID-19/epidemiology , Quality of Health Care , Aged , Humans , Models, Organizational , Netherlands , Quality Assurance, Health Care/ethics , Quality of Health Care/ethics , Residential Facilities/ethics , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , Residential Facilities/standards
6.
Soc Work Health Care ; 60(2): 166-176, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1147881

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to the U.S. mental healthcare system. Immediate action has been required to transform existing social work practice models to ensure uninterrupted delivery of essential mental health services. This paper describes how clinicians in a residential program, who offered an in-person multi-family education workshop, rapidly pivoted in the context of the pandemic to develop and implement an alternative and unique multi-family intervention model - a virtual family town hall. This innovative telehealth practice model serves as an exemplar of best practices amidst the COVID-19 pandemic as it prioritized health and safety, increased accessibility, and allowed clinicians to effectively respond to family members' heightened informational needs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Family , Health Education/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Social Work/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Comorbidity , Hospitals, Psychiatric/organization & administration , Humans , Pandemics , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Telemed J E Health ; 27(1): 102-106, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066235

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The vulnerability of postacute and long-term care (PA/LTC) facility residents to COVID-19 has manifested across the world with increasing facility outbreaks associated with high hospitalization and mortality rates. Systematic protocols to guide telehealth-centered interventions in response to COVID-19 outbreaks have yet to be delineated. This article is intended to inform PA/LTC facilities and neighboring health care partners how to collaboratively utilize telehealth-centered strategies to improve outcomes in facility outbreaks. Methods: The University of Virginia rapidly developed a multidisciplinary telehealth-centered COVID-19 facility outbreak strategy in response to a LTC facility outbreak in which 41 (out of 48) facility residents and 7 staff members tested positive. This strategy focused on supporting the facility team remotely using rapidly deployed technologic solutions. Goals included (1) early identification of patients who need their care escalated, (2) monitoring and treating patients deemed safe to remain in the facility, (3) care coordination to facilitate bidirectional transfers between the skilled nursing facility (SNF) and hospital, and (4) daily facility needs assessment related to technology, infection control, and staff well-being. To achieve these goals, a standardized approach centered on daily multidisciplinary virtual rounds and telemedicine consultation was provided. Results: Over a month since the outbreak began, 18 out of 48 (38%) facility residents required hospitalization and 6 (12.5%) died. Eleven facility residents have since returned back to the SNF after recovering from their hospitalization. No staff required hospitalization. Conclusions: Interventions that reduce hospitalizations and mortality are a critical need during the COVID-19 pandemic. The mortality and hospitalization rates seen in this PA/LTC facility outbreak are significantly lower than has been documented in other facility outbreaks. Our multidisciplinary approach centered on telemedicine should be considered as other PA/LTC facilities partner with neighboring health care systems in responding to COVID-19 outbreaks. We have begun replicating these services to additional PA/LTC facilities facing COVID-19 outbreaks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Remote Consultation/organization & administration , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , Subacute Care/organization & administration , Continuity of Patient Care , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors
9.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 9(5): 626-629, 2020 Nov 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-840776

ABSTRACT

Children in pediatric long-term care (LTC) facilities are commonly infected with respiratory tract viruses as they have many high-risk co-morbidities and require significant interactions with the healthcare team. From previous studies, we know that infected staff can often be the source of transmission of infection to the children. If instituted quickly, infection control practices can help mitigate the spread of infection. We will describe how Sunshine Children's Home and Rehabilitation Center responded to federal and state infection control and prevention mandates in LTC for COVID-19. We will report our practice changes, staff and resident screening, and testing results as well as outcomes of the COVID-19-infected cases. The outcomes for COVID-19 infection among pediatric LTC staff and residents are in stark contrast to the data available for the adult providers and residents in adult nursing homes. Implementation and change in infection control practices and procedures resulted in much fewer cases of COVID-19 infection in our pediatric LTC residents.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Long-Term Care , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , Adolescent , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient , Male , New York , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
11.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(37): 1296-1299, 2020 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-782532

ABSTRACT

Long-term care facility (LTCF) residents are at particularly high risk for morbidity and mortality associated with infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), given their age and high prevalence of chronic medical conditions, combined with functional impairment that often requires frequent, close contact with health care providers, who might inadvertently spread the virus to residents (1,2). During March-May 2020 in Fulton County, Georgia, >50% of COVID-19-associated deaths occurred among LTCF residents, although these persons represented <1% of the population (3,4). Mass testing for SARS-CoV-2 has been an effective strategy for identifying asymptomatic and presymptomatic infections in LTCFs (5). This analysis sought to evaluate the timing at which mass testing took place in relation to the known presence of a COVID-19 infection and the resulting number of infections that occurred. In 15 LTCFs that performed facility-wide testing in response to an identified case, high prevalences of additional cases in residents and staff members were found at initial testing (28.0% and 7.4%, respectively), suggesting spread of infection had already occurred by the time the first case was identified. Prevalence was also high during follow-up, with a total of 42.4% of residents and 11.8% of staff members infected overall in the response facilities. In comparison, 13 LTCFs conducted testing as a preventive strategy before a case was identified. Although the majority of these LTCFs identified at least one COVID-19 case, the prevalence was significantly lower at initial testing in both residents and staff members (0.5% and 1.0%, respectively) and overall after follow-up (1.5% and 1.7%, respectively). These findings indicate that early awareness of infections might help facilities prevent potential outbreaks by prioritizing and adhering more strictly to infection prevention and control (IPC) recommendations, resulting in fewer infections than would occur when relying on symptom-based screening (6,7).


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Mass Screening/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , Aged , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology
12.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 21(9): 1186-1190, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-625907

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected residents and staff at long-term care (LTC) and other residential facilities in the United States. The high morbidity and mortality at these facilities has been attributed to a combination of a particularly vulnerable population and a lack of resources to mitigate the risk. During the first wave of the pandemic, the federal and state governments received urgent calls for help from LTC and residential care facilities; between March and early June of 2020, policymakers responded with dozens of regulatory and policy changes. In this article, we provide an overview of these responses by first summarizing federal regulatory changes and then reviewing state-level executive orders. The policy and regulatory changes implemented at the federal and state levels can be categorized into the following 4 classes: (1) preventing virus transmission, which includes policies relating to visitation restrictions, personal protective equipment guidance, and testing requirements; (2) expanding facilities' capacities, which includes both the expansion of physical space for isolation purposes and the expansion of workforce to combat COVID-19; (3) relaxing administrative requirements, which includes measures enacted to shift the attention of caretakers and administrators from administrative requirements to residents' care; and (4) reporting COVID-19 data, which includes the reporting of cases and deaths to residents, families, and administrative bodies (such as state health departments). These policies represent a snapshot of the initial efforts to mitigate damage inflicted by the pandemic. Looking ahead, empirical evaluation of the consequences of these policies-including potential unintended effects-is urgently needed. The recent availability of publicly reported COVID-19 LTC data can be used to inform the development of evidence-based regulations, though there are concerns of reporting inaccuracies. Importantly, these data should also be used to systematically identify hot spots and help direct resources to struggling facilities.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Residential Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , Assisted Living Facilities/organization & administration , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Federal Government , Government Programs/organization & administration , Humans , Long-Term Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
14.
J Aging Soc Policy ; 32(4-5): 403-409, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-574940

ABSTRACT

An estimated 3.5 million direct care staff working in facilities and people's homes play a critical role during the COVID-19 pandemic. They allow vulnerable care recipients to stay at home and they provide necessary help in facilities. Direct care staff, on average, have decades of experience, often have certifications and licenses, and many have at least some college education to help them perform the myriad of responsibilities to properly care for care recipients. Yet, they are at heightened health and financial risks. They often receive low wages, limited benefits, and have few financial resources to fall back on when they get sick themselves and can no longer work. Furthermore, most direct care staff are parents with children in the house and almost one-fourth are single parents. If they fall ill, both they and their families are put into physical and financial risk.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Health Personnel/economics , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Humans , Pandemics , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Socioeconomic Factors
15.
J Aging Soc Policy ; 32(4-5): 373-379, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-437224

ABSTRACT

Hong Kong is a major international travel hub and a densely populated city geographically adjacent to Mainland China. Despite these risk factors, it has managed to contain the COVID-19 epidemic without a total lockdown of the city. Three months on since the outbreak, the city reported slightly more than 1,000 infected people, only four deaths and no infection in residential care homes or adult day care centers. Public health intervention and population behavioral change were credited as reasons for this success. Hong Kong's public health intervention was developed from the lessons learned during the SARS epidemic in 2003 that killed 299 people, including 57 residential care residents. This perspective summarizes Hong Kong's responses to the COVID-19 virus, with a specific focus on how the long-term care system contained the spread of COVID-19 into residential care homes and home and community-based services.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Long-Term Care/standards , Policy , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2
16.
J Aging Soc Policy ; 32(4-5): 310-315, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-31016

ABSTRACT

The elderly in long-term care (LTC) and their caregiving staff are at elevated risk from COVID-19. Outbreaks in LTC facilities can threaten the health care system. COVID-19 suppression should focus on testing and infection control at LTC facilities. Policies should also be developed to ensure that LTC facilities remain adequately staffed and that infection control protocols are closely followed. Family will not be able to visit LTC facilities, increasing isolation and vulnerability to abuse and neglect. To protect residents and staff, supervision of LTC facilities should remain a priority during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Residential Facilities/organization & administration , Aged , Aging , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Elder Abuse/prevention & control , Elder Abuse/psychology , Family/psychology , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Residential Facilities/standards , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Isolation/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL